Your network's hardest problem is format heterogeneity.
Every trading partner speaks a slightly different HL7 v2. Health1st automates per-partner v2 ↔ FHIR mapping and translates at the network edge — so onboarding scales with the network instead of against it.
- AI-drafted, per-partner mappings — reviewed by your team
- Edge translation for TEFCA/QHIN exchange
- US Core & USCDI conformance, validated before go-live
MSH|^~\&|EPIC|HOSP|H1ST|DST|202601..||ADT^A01|
PID|1||MRN12345^^^HOSP^MR||DOE^JOHN^A||
19701225|M|||123 MAIN ST^^AUSTIN^TX
PV1|1|I|ICU^101^A|||...admit...
DG1|1|I10|E11.9^Type 2 diabetes mellitusAgent
{ "resourceType": "Patient",
"identifier": [{ "value": "MRN12345" }],
"name": [{ "family": "Doe",
"given": ["John","A"] }],
"gender": "male",
"birthDate": "1970-12-25" }
{ "resourceType": "Condition",
"code": { "coding": [{
"system": "…/icd-10-cm",
"code": "E11.9" }] } }In short
Heterogeneity you can't hire your way past
A network's value grows with every participant — but so does its onboarding backlog, when every partner is a hand-built interface with its own dialect of v2.
Every partner speaks a different dialect
Hundreds of trading partners, each with their own HL7 v2 quirks, Z-segments, code sets, and local conventions. Heterogeneity is the whole problem — and it grows with every new member.
Onboarding doesn't scale
Each new participant is a manual interface project. Your onboarding queue is the bottleneck on network growth, and hand-mapping every partner doesn't get cheaper with volume.
v2 ↔ FHIR at the network edge
Members still push HL7 v2 while the network needs to query and respond in FHIR. Translation has to happen at the edge, per-partner, at exchange volume — reliably.
US Core & TEFCA conformance
It isn't enough to translate — the output has to conform. US Core profiles, USCDI data content, and TEFCA/QHIN governance all have to be satisfied and evidenced.
Onboard a partner once; reuse the pipeline for the next
AI drafts the per-partner mapping and code crosswalks; your team validates against US Core before anything enters the network.
- 1
Ingest the partner's real messages
Point Health1st at a new trading partner's HL7 v2 feed — ADT, ORU lab results, ORM orders, MDM documents — including their local Z-segments and code conventions.
- 2
AI drafts a per-partner mapping
The Mapping Agent proposes a partner-specific v2 ↔ FHIR mapping to US Core, and the Terminology Agent crosswalks local codes to LOINC, SNOMED, ICD-10, and RxNorm — with confidence scores.
- 3
Validate against US Core & TEFCA
Conformance-test the output against US Core profiles and USCDI content before the partner goes live, so what enters the network is already valid — not fixed after the fact.
- 4
Translate at the edge, at scale
Run bidirectional translation at the network edge for that partner in production. The next partner reuses the pipeline — onboarding becomes repeatable instead of bespoke.
Translation built for many-partner, high-volume exchange
Automated per-partner mapping
Each trading partner gets an AI-drafted, versioned mapping instead of a from-scratch interface build. Onboarding scales with the network, not against it.
Edge translation for QHIN exchange
Bidirectional v2 ↔ FHIR at the network edge, so members can keep sending v2 while the network queries and responds in FHIR for TEFCA exchange.
Lab results (ORU) at volume
Diagnostic labs push HL7 v2 ORU results everywhere. Health1st maps ORU to FHIR Observation/DiagnosticReport with LOINC normalization, at production throughput.
US Core & USCDI conformance
Output is validated against US Core profiles and USCDI data content, with audit trails — conformance you can evidence to partners and governance bodies.
Built for the people who run the network
Platform and interoperability leaders accountable for onboarding throughput and conformance.
VP Engineering / Platform
Scale trading-partner onboarding without linearly scaling headcount — a repeatable pipeline instead of bespoke interface builds.
Chief Interoperability Officer
Demonstrable US Core / USCDI conformance and TEFCA-ready edge translation, with audit trails for governance.
Head of Standards / Conformance
Validated output before partners go live, and local-code crosswalks to LOINC/SNOMED/ICD-10 handled consistently across the network.
Security & Compliance
Enterprise-grade trust, stated honestly
Protecting PHI is non-negotiable. Here's exactly where our certifications stand — no overclaiming.
Compliant · BAAs available
Audit in progress
On roadmap
Native, by design
AWS HIPAA-eligible infrastructure · Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) · Encryption in transit & at rest · See our security details →
Frequently asked questions
Make partner onboarding repeatable, not bespoke.
Send us a trading partner's real v2 feed — ORU, ADT, or otherwise. We'll draft the US Core mapping live.
