Health1st AI Logo

Solutions · Research Institutions & Sites

Sponsor-grade rigor, without a sponsor-sized team.

Your coordinators are doing three jobs each, and the paperwork is the thing that slips. Health1st AI gives academic medical centers, hospitals, and sites the rigor an inspector expects — guided CRF and consent build, automated source-data review, safety detection, and a TMF that stays ready — without the headcount you'll never get funded.

What you own

Your goals

  • Meet GCP and regulatory expectations with a lean team
  • Reduce documentation burden on investigators and coordinators
  • Stay inspection-ready across multiple concurrent studies
  • Improve participant experience with plain-language consent

We know how this feels

The pains we remove

You're holding several studies together with a handful of people, and you know the documentation is the first thing to fall behind when a clinic day runs long.

  • Everyone wears three hats, so the documentation is exactly what slips when the day gets away from you
  • Keeping informed consent readable — and correct across languages and versions — is a job no one has time for
  • Source-document review and query handling swallow hours your coordinators don't have
  • Every inspection turns into a scramble that pulls the whole team off study work

And the part no one says out loud:

  • An inspector opening a study you thought was in good shape and finding the gaps you never had time to close
  • A consent or eligibility miss on a participant — the kind of finding that follows the site, not just the study

Where the agents fit

Every pain, matched to the agent that removes it

The grind you just read isn't abstract — each piece of it already has an agent assigned. Here's which one picks up which fight, so you can see exactly where the help lands before you commit to anything.

Your agentic workforce

The agents that help

These feature agents map most directly to research institutions & sites. Enable the ones you need, per study and per deliverable, and expand over time.

Outcomes

What good looks like

Quantified targets we build toward with each engagement.

8th-grade
Consent readability by default
30+
Consent languages
Always
Inspection-ready TMF

Figures shown are pre-launch targets based on internal benchmarks, not guaranteed outcomes.

Every output is grounded, reviewed, and inspection-ready

We don't have a regulatory department — we have me and two coordinators. Having the TMF stay complete on its own, and consent versions tracked for us, is the difference between dreading a monitoring visit and being ready for one.
Clinical Research Coordinator, academic medical center

Illustrative — representative of the workflows we build toward during our pre-launch pilot.

No pressure, straight answers

What you're probably wondering

The doubts that usually surface before a team like yours says yes — answered plainly, including the places where the honest answer is a limit rather than a promise.

Let's see it on your study

See it run on one of your own studies — no pressure, no obligation, and honest answers, including on the limits. We will walk research institutions & sites through exactly what stays under your control.

← Back to all solutions (by organization and more)